Who publishes the number first
Every figure in this Part has an origin, and it is never an app. The exchanges publish the prices: NSE and BSE each put out a daily record of every scrip's open, high, low, close and volume, along with the corporate-action record that fixes every ex-date. That is the statement against which any price history is checked.
The company publishes the fundamentals, on the clock 01.08.02 set out, through the exchange's corporate-announcements feed and its own website. The registrar and the depositories hold the entitlement detail behind a corporate action.
Everything else — a broker's terminal, a screener, a charting site, a data vendor — is a copy of these with processing applied, and the processing is exactly what chapter 03.03 has been about. A copy is not worse than the original. It is just not the thing you reconcile to.
The six checks
Run these once on any series before you measure anything with it. Tap each.
These check whether a series can be measured. None of them says anything about whether a company is worth owning.
What clean does and does not mean
Clean data is not accurate prediction and it is not a good company. It means one narrow thing: the series says what it claims to say, so a number measured from it is a measurement rather than an artefact.
It is also not a one-off state. A source that passed last year can change its adjustment policy, its vendor or its coverage without telling anyone, and a series that was complete can acquire a gap. The six checks are cheap enough to repeat when something surprises you.
And when a check fails, the answer is rarely to abandon the source. It is to know the failure and work around it: use the raw series and adjust yourself, or exclude the affected span, or carry the difference as a stated uncertainty. A known flaw is usable. An unknown one is not.
- Daily open, high, low, close and volume
- the exchange's own daily record
- Ex-dates, ratios and entitlements
- the exchange's corporate-action record
- Results, shareholding, material events
- the company, filed to the exchange (01.08.02)
- Index levels and constituents
- the index provider's published series
- Anything in an app or a screener
- a processed copy of the above
Two reputable sources show different five-year returns for the same company. Both handle its split correctly. What is the most likely explanation?
Primary source, or a processed copy?
A chart cannot be read until four things are settled: the chart type chose what to keep (03.01), the scale and frame chose how it is drawn (03.02), the data decided whether the numbers deserve drawing at all (03.03), and the workspace saves all of it so the decisions are made once rather than in the moment (03.04). None of it forecasts anything. All of it determines whether what you are looking at is worth being surprised by.
The instrument is now built and checked. What remains is the thing it was built to show: a single mark, four numbers wide, and everything people claim to read in it.